Ring Theory · Advanced

Zero divisors in a ring of functions

Advanced Ring Theory question for CSIR-NET · GATE. Choose an option, check your answer, then read the detailed solution.

Ring TheoryZero Divisors & UnitsAdvancedCSIR-NET · GATE1 September 2026

Question RT-008

Let $R$ be the ring of all functions $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ under pointwise addition and multiplication. For a subset $A\subseteq\mathbb R$, let $\chi_A$ denote its indicator function, i.e. $\chi_A(x)=1$ if $x\in A$ and $\chi_A(x)=0$ otherwise. Which of the following statements about $(R,+,\times)$ is FALSE?

Detailed Solution

$R$ is a commutative ring with pointwise operations, and the constant function $1(x)=1$ is a multiplicative identity, so (A) is true. Let $f=\chi_{[0,1]}$ and $g=\chi_{(1,2]}$; both are nonzero (e.g. $f(0)=1$, $g(1.5)=1$), but since $[0,1]$ and $(1,2]$ are disjoint, $f(x)g(x)=0$ for every $x\in\mathbb R$, so $fg=0$. Hence $f$ and $g$ are nonzero zero divisors, so (B) is true. If $f(x)\neq 0$ for every $x$, then $g(x)=1/f(x)$ defines $g\in R$ with $fg=1$, so $f$ is a unit; conversely if $fg=1$ then $f(x)g(x)=1$ forces $f(x)\neq 0$ for every $x$. So (C) is true. Since (B) exhibits an explicit pair of nonzero zero divisors, statement (D) is FALSE. Thus the correct option is $\boxed{\mathrm{D}}$.
Concepts tested: Zero divisorsUnitsFunction rings
💬 Discuss this problem
Have a doubt or a different approach? Continue the mathematics discussion on Telegram.
Join Telegram Discussion

Keep Practising

More Ring Theory Questions

A reduced ring and zero divisors

AdvancedCSIR-NET · GATE5 Sep 2026

If a²=0 forces a=0, does ab=0 imply ba=0?

Attempt Question →

Sum of a Unit and a Commuting Nilpotent Element

AdvancedCSIR-NET · GATE27 Oct 2026

Is the sum of a unit and a commuting nilpotent element always invertible?

Attempt Question →

Degree of the Product of Polynomials

AdvancedCSIR-NET · GATE25 Oct 2026

Why does the degree of a product equal the sum of degrees over an integral domain?

Attempt Question →