An exotic ring structure on Z isomorphic to the integers
Advanced Ring Theory question for CSIR-NET · GATE. Choose an option, check your answer, then read the detailed solution.
Question RT-009
On the set $\mathbb Z$, define new operations by $a\oplus b=a+b-1$ and $a\otimes b=a+b-ab$ for all $a,b\in\mathbb Z$. Which of the following is TRUE about $(\mathbb Z,\oplus,\otimes)$?
Detailed Solution
Define $\varphi:\mathbb Z\to\mathbb Z$ by $\varphi(x)=1-x$; this is a bijection (it is its own inverse). Check $\varphi(a\oplus b)=1-(a+b-1)=2-a-b=(1-a)+(1-b)=\varphi(a)+\varphi(b)$, and $\varphi(a\otimes b)=1-(a+b-ab)=1-a-b+ab=(1-a)(1-b)=\varphi(a)\varphi(b)$. So $\varphi$ is a ring isomorphism from $(\mathbb Z,\oplus,\otimes)$ onto the ordinary ring $(\mathbb Z,+,\times)$, which is an integral domain; hence so is $(\mathbb Z,\oplus,\otimes)$, proving (B) and simultaneously ruling out (C) (an integral domain has no zero divisors). Under this correspondence, the $\oplus$-identity is $\varphi^{-1}(0)=1$, not $0$ (ruling out (D)), and the $\otimes$-identity is $\varphi^{-1}(1)=0$, not $1$ (so (A), which swaps the two, is false). Thus the correct option is $\boxed{\mathrm{B}}$.Concepts tested: Ring isomorphismsIntegral domainsChange of operations
💬 Discuss this problem
Have a doubt or a different approach? Continue the mathematics discussion on Telegram.
Join Telegram Discussion
Have a doubt or a different approach? Continue the mathematics discussion on Telegram.
Join Telegram Discussion
Keep Practising
More Ring Theory Questions
Complement of an Idempotent Element
If $e$ is idempotent in a ring with unity, what can be said about $1-e$?
Attempt Question →Nontrivial Idempotents in $\mathbb Z_3\times\mathbb Z_3$
Does the product ring $\mathbb Z_3\times\mathbb Z_3$ contain nontrivial idempotents?
Attempt Question →Polynomial Multiplication over $\mathbb Z_4$
Why can the degree of a product drop in $\mathbb Z_4[x]$?
Attempt Question →